Justice: Difference between revisions
From The Common People
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
##'''Historical institutional abuse''' ''- Allegations around abuse in children's homes in Northern Ireland. The government has not accepted liability and disputes around compensation remain.'' | ##'''Historical institutional abuse''' ''- Allegations around abuse in children's homes in Northern Ireland. The government has not accepted liability and disputes around compensation remain.'' | ||
##'''Covid-19 healthcare worker deaths''' ''- No liability accepted over claims that lack of PPE led to the deaths of frontline staff. Families pursuing legal action.'' | ##'''Covid-19 healthcare worker deaths''' ''- No liability accepted over claims that lack of PPE led to the deaths of frontline staff. Families pursuing legal action.'' | ||
#Sustained denial of legal liability in the face of public calls for proper compensation is difficult to justify persuasively on any grounds - financial, legal or political. While reasons of cost, precedent and bureaucratic reluctance may have led to departmental stonewalling and subsequent delay, these concerns appear | #Sustained denial of legal liability in the face of public calls for proper compensation is difficult to justify persuasively on any grounds - financial, legal or political. While reasons of cost, precedent and bureaucratic reluctance may have led to departmental stonewalling and subsequent delay, these concerns appear insignificant compared to basic requirements of justice, honour and democratic accountability. Political leaders denying liabilities may be excessively motivated by knee-jerk institutional denial and short-term thinking, losing sight of the bigger moral picture and public duty is an unacceptable position which time and again fails the public good. | ||
Revision as of 15:42, 29 July 2023
(Return to the manifesto)
- The Common People will immediately order a fast-track task force to expose and accept government liability, and expedite compensation payments within the 5-year lifetime of the parliament, in the following cases:
- Post-Office Horizon scandal - While some settlements have been paid, over 550 additional appeals remain unresolved and the present government maintains there are no grounds for further liability payouts.
- Undercover policing - Claims from additional women yet to reach settlement or conclusion. The government admits ethical issues but is resisting legal liability.
- Windrush scandal - Despite apologies and some compensation, the government has not admitted formal legal liability for hardships faced by Windrush immigrants.
- Historical institutional abuse - Allegations around abuse in children's homes in Northern Ireland. The government has not accepted liability and disputes around compensation remain.
- Covid-19 healthcare worker deaths - No liability accepted over claims that lack of PPE led to the deaths of frontline staff. Families pursuing legal action.
- Sustained denial of legal liability in the face of public calls for proper compensation is difficult to justify persuasively on any grounds - financial, legal or political. While reasons of cost, precedent and bureaucratic reluctance may have led to departmental stonewalling and subsequent delay, these concerns appear insignificant compared to basic requirements of justice, honour and democratic accountability. Political leaders denying liabilities may be excessively motivated by knee-jerk institutional denial and short-term thinking, losing sight of the bigger moral picture and public duty is an unacceptable position which time and again fails the public good.